Please  find an article or news story about some whistle-blowing situation.  Please do not use high-profile cases like Snowden or Manning. If you can  find the same story described by different sources all the better. Do  not use some personal experience unless it was discussed in credible new  sources. I need to be able to verify the account. 

Then,  using the attached worksheet, discuss the case. Specifically, after  telling me about the case in a concise paragraph, you will identify all  of the key stakeholders and how you feel they were impacted. For  example, if someone released company records and emails to blow the  whistle, discuss whose emails and how the information led to actions  against them. If no one was negatively impacted, then why use it for  this case study? 

Discuss  the final outcome (see directions), and most importantly, use your  moral compass to describe or explain why you feel someone?s actions were  morally wrong. DO NOT attempt to work out what any of the actors  involved were thinking or what motivation they may or may not have had.  What matters is ONLY your beliefs about whether the actions were morally  right or wrong. Use named moral theories to support your position.  Again, if there was no wrongdoing, why was some whistle blown? 

Finally,  imagine you are in a leadership position. What could you reasonably do  to keep the situation from happening again and prevent someone from  feeling a need to blow the whistle? Depending on the situation, you may  feel the real wrongdoer is the whistleblower. If so, then describe why  what the company/government did or is doing is justified, again using  your moral theories.